SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.00276

Extensions in Semiparametric Geostatistical Models

Abstract

In spatial statistics, the incorrect selection of an appropriate covariance function may lead to inference errors and confidence underestimation. Motivated by such restrictions, we introduce and evaluate a flexible semiparametric approach for estimating spatial covariance functions based on Bernstein polynomials. The proposed formulation is general and applicable to classes of models that incorporate latent spatial effects in georeferenced data, such as Spatial Generalized Linear Mixed Models. Empirical validation was conducted via Monte Carlo simulations, and model fitting was performed using Bayesian inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo. Simulated scenarios demonstrated the model's ability to recover structural covariance configurations with low bias and high parameter precision. The practical applicability of the methodology was tested using real abundance data for American Robin (Turdus migratorius) from the North American Breeding Bird Survey. The proposed model, featuring a Negative Binomial structure, yielded satisfactory results, efficiently capturing the overdispersion inherent in the count data. The estimated range parameter of 381.48 km revealed that the species' spatial dependence operates at a regional scale, suggesting that unobserved ecological processes act homogeneously within this radius of environmental influence. Additionally, predictive validation using an independent sample (n_pred = 34) demonstrated the model's strong generalization capability via Bayesian Kriging, producing point projections that closely matched observed values and well-calibrated prediction intervals. It is concluded that the proposed approach represents a robust methodological advancement, establishing itself as a flexible and efficient tool.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Maíra Soalheiro, Marcos Oliveira Prates, Victor Hugo Lachos, Fábio Nogueira Demarqui. 2026-07-31. Extensions in Semiparametric Geostatistical Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00276

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME