SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.00367

Sylvester's Theorem and Reduced Linear Systems: From Three-Factor Products to Small Dynamical Models

Abstract

Large systems of linear equations often contain far fewer active degrees of freedom than their ambient dimension suggests. A particularly transparent instance occurs when a large matrix factors as A = TSW, where T is m x n, S is n x n, and W is n x m, and m >> n. The action of A then passes through an n-dimensional intermediate space. Sylvester's theorem relates the nonzero eigenvalues of a product XY to those of the reversed product YX. Applied cyclically, it shows that the nonzero spectrum of the large matrix A is completely determined by either of the small matrices B = (WT)S, C = S(WT). This article develops the theorem from first principles and explains the geometry behind the factorization. The result yields exact reduced systems, both for linear algebraic equations and for first-order linear ordinary differential equations. Worked examples carry this through in detail: spectral reduction, reconstruction of full-space eigenvectors, reduced solution of shifted systems, and exact integration of a three-dimensional ODE through a two-dimensional model. A separate section takes up singular values. Those of A, B, and C do not agree in general, though they do when the bases are orthonormal, a case the same theorem settles once it is applied to A*A. The closing sections separate exact factorization from projection-based approximation, and flag what the theorem leaves undetermined: zero-eigenvalue structure, conditioning, and transient behavior. The material is classical. What this article adds is one continuous development, from first principles through to the limits of the theorem, pitched for an upper-level undergraduate course.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

James M. Hyman. 2026-08-01. Sylvester's Theorem and Reduced Linear Systems: From Three-Factor Products to Small Dynamical Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00367

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO