SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.00451

Robust Polynomial Freiman-Ruzsa from Corrupted Set Observations

Abstract

We study structural recovery from an exact but adversarially corrupted set observation over $\mathbb F_2^n$. A hidden nonempty set $A$ satisfies $|A+A|\leq K|A|$, while the algorithm receives deterministic membership access and independent exact uniform samples only from a set $B$ satisfying $|A\triangle B|\leq\eta|A|$. For $\eta\leq cK^{-1/2}$, we give a randomized FPT-form algorithm which, with high probability, outputs a subspace $V$ satisfying $|V|\leq|A|$ and $\mathcal N_V(A)\leq K^{O(1)}$. For every supplied $\eta<1$, writing $\varepsilon=1-\eta$, we also give an observation-only algorithm that outputs $O(\sqrt K\,\varepsilon^{-2}\log(3/\varepsilon))$ subspaces. For every hidden set compatible with $B,K,\eta$, some list entry has size at most that hidden set and covering number $\operatorname{poly}(K,\varepsilon^{-1})$. The sample complexity is polynomial, while the direct query and running-time bounds are XP. Every nonempty compatibility class also admits, nonconstructively, one common subspace $V$ such that $|V|\leq|A|$ and $\mathcal N_V(A)\leq2K(1-\eta)^{-1}P_{\rm PFR}(K)$ simultaneously for every compatible hidden set $A$. An exact two-subspace construction forces common covering cost $\Theta((1-\eta)^{-1/2})$, leaving quantitative and algorithmic list-to-single gaps. We further show that the $K^{-1/2}$ contamination scale is optimal up to constants for the one-core, size-only lifting mechanism used in the single-output argument. The proofs combine a persistent randomized Balog-Szemer\'edi-Gowers procedure producing a fixed implicit small-doubling subset on the $\sqrt{\alpha}$ retained-mass scale, conditionally exact finite product sampling, size-oblivious algorithmic PFR, and deterministic lifting.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Cheng Peng. 2026-08-01. Robust Polynomial Freiman-Ruzsa from Corrupted Set Observations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00451

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS