SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.00762

An Analysis of Brent's Insertion Method for Hash Tables

Abstract

In 1968, Richard P.~Brent introduced a new way of building a hash table that, at least empirically, achieves a remarkable property: Even if the hash table is filled to 100\% full, the expected time to query a \emph{random key out of those present} is $O(1)$. Despite the simplicity of Brent's method, the guarantees of the method have never been formally analyzed. This is due to the subtle issue of handling \emph{spoiled randomness}. The algorithm will sometimes try to use hash functions $h_j$ on keys $y$ that it has already probed in the past. When the algorithm does this, we cannot treat the hash function as random, because its random bits have already affected the state of the table. This issue makes Brent's method surprisingly subtle to reason about formally. In this note, we give a simple and formal analysis of Brent's hash table. The analysis can be taught in a graduate randomized algorithms course, and provides a nice example of how to deal with subtle issues in a probabilistic analysis (namely, the issue of spoiled randomness).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

William Kuszmaul. 2026-08-01. An Analysis of Brent's Insertion Method for Hash Tables. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00762

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS