Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.00844

BoilerSketch: A TA-Supervised, Diagram-First GenAI Practice for Structured Diagrams in CS1/Early CS2

Ethan Dickey·Vivan Tiwari·Anvit Sinha·Andres Bejarano
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This innovative practice full paper presents BoilerSketch, a TA-supervised, diagram-first GenAI practice and tablet interface for providing structured visual explanations in CS1 and early CS2 support settings. Large early computing courses routinely face a support bottleneck during labs and office hours because many student questions are best answered with a diagram rather than additional text, yet most AI tutoring tools remain text-forward and unreliable at producing accurate, pedagogically useful visuals. BoilerSketch addresses this gap through a dual-pane interaction model that combines chat with a pen-enabled whiteboard for student sketches and a prompting strategy that constrains the model to generate structured, renderable Mermaid diagrams rather than free-form images. To preserve academic integrity, the system is intentionally scoped to conceptual explanation: it forbids executable code and code-level debugging and uses a human-in-the-loop workflow in which teaching assistants remain accountable supervisors who can monitor sessions and intervene when responses require correction, deeper probing, or escalation to live help. We report a 45-minute expert evaluation with 21 instructional staff from a large programming course who used BoilerSketch on representative questions and completed a post-use survey. Two-thirds rated the system at least moderately helpful for conceptual understanding and at least moderately useful for typical support tasks. Staff saw the strongest value in routine diagram-based explanations and noted limits in diagram depth and applicability to more advanced topics. We conclude with practical guidance for adopting supervised, diagram-first GenAI support in early computing courses, emphasizing scope-and-escalation rules, prompt-as-policy guardrails, and reliable structured diagram rendering.

Explore related subjects

cs.CYcs.HC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ethan Dickey, Vivan Tiwari, Anvit Sinha, Andres Bejarano. 2026-08-01. BoilerSketch: A TA-Supervised, Diagram-First GenAI Practice for Structured Diagrams in CS1/Early CS2. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00844

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Work, Wellbeing, and Choice: Empirical Lessons for AI Futures

Advances in AI-driven automation have raised questions about how humans might find wellbeing in a world where paid employment is less necessary or less available than before. Paid work has been variously characterized as both a contributor and an impediment to human wellbeing. What is already known about the relationship between paid work and wellbeing? What factors influence wellbeing among people who do not work---or who do not need to work? And how might these factors bear upon prospective AI-induced economic transformations? To help provide empirical grounding for these questions, we survey the psychological, sociological, and economic literature that investigates the relationship between wellbeing and work. We draw on evidence from multiple populations, including the unemployed, retirees, lottery winners, and financially dependent spouses. This comparative review draws from studies across OECD countries, China, India, and Gulf states. We identify three key factors that mediate the relationship between work status and wellbeing: (1) agency and choice---whether the exit from work is voluntary or involuntary, as well as long-term agency; (2) the availability of alternative sources of work's latent benefits---such as volunteering, hobbies, or state-provisioned employment; and (3) social and systemic context---including cultural norms around work and the robustness of social safety nets. We draw on these three factors to derive specific implications for different AI automation scenarios, connecting the empirical evidence to concrete policy considerations.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

From Digital Accountability to Accountable Digitality Through Needs-Aware Information Systems: The Case of Auditable Child-Welfare Judgments

Digital accountability research asks how digital systems can, among other aims, be made transparent, explainable, auditable, contestable, and supportive of ongoing learning and improvement. This paper reverses the question: how can digital transformation make established human institutions more accountable? It theorizes this reversal as accountable digitality and specifies needs-aware information systems as the mediating mechanism. The hard and paradigmatic case is child-welfare judgment, where best-interest procedures must protect children, preserve confidentiality, and respect judicial independence while enabling aggregate learning about needs, reasons, exceptions, and disparities. The case is used diagnostically and illustratively to derive and examine the design logic, not as empirical evidence or validation. Conceptual design-oriented analysis decomposes and recombines digital and legal accountability under child-rights constraints, deriving a canonical theory-to-design chain, contingent mechanisms, implications, and safeguards. It advances IS responsibility and ethics research by showing how privacy-preserving, co-created, needs-aware information systems can support institutional self-knowledge and auditable justice.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

(Whose defaults?) Is artificial intelligence reorienting archaeological methods?

Generative AI and the practice of "vibe coding" are changing how archaeologists carry out computational research, but their effects on the discipline's range of methods is still understudied. In this paper, we evaluate whether large language models (LLMs) are narrowing the variety of methods archaeologists use. We first analysed approximately 119,000 archaeology abstracts from Scopus, covering publications from 2010 to 2025. Using a locally run LLM, we identified the computational methods reported in each abstract and organised them into 25 broad categories (L2) and 241 finer clusters (L3). A Bayesian Dirichlet-multinomial model of method composition within sub-disciplines found a small but credible shift in method use after 2023. However, this shift was smaller than the variation already present across the full study period. No individual technique showed a significant change, and overall methodological diversity increased rather than declined. We then ran a controlled experiment to see whether LLMs recommend a narrower set of methods than archaeologists have used in practice. Two different open-weight models were asked to suggest methods for 28 archaeological research problems, with prompts providing three levels of methodological guidance: novice, intermediate, and expert. Recommendation diversity was much lower than in the published literature, particularly without methodological guidance. The models also tended to favour methods that were widely used before 2023, and their recommendations more closely resembled the post-2023 literature. Taken together, these results are consistent with LLMs pushing methodological choice towards convergence, although our study cannot establish a causal effect. They raise a broader question: how can archaeology retain methodological diversity as LLMs become more involved in research?

cs.CY↗