SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.00959

MixedComplementarityProblems.jl: A Fast, Batched, Open-Source Interior Point Solver for Mixed Complementarity Problems

Abstract

Mixed complementarity problems (MCPs) arise as the first-order optimality conditions of nonlinear programs and noncooperative games, and provide a natural formulation for multi-agent trajectory optimization problems that appear throughout robotics. The dominant solver for problems of this form is PATH, which offers strong performance on robotics problems but remains closed-source. We present MixedComplementarityProblems.jl, an open-source, pure Julia implementation of an interior point method for parametric MCPs that: (i) matches PATH's reliability on standard benchmarks, (ii) natively supports batched, parallel processing of many parameter instances, either across CPU threads or on an NVIDIA GPU, and (iii) supports efficient automatic differentiation of solutions with respect to problem parameters. On a multi-agent lane-change trajectory game representative of robotics planning problems, our CPU-multithreaded batched solver clears a batch of parametric instances ~100x faster than sequential calls to PATH. A GPU backend, running the same solver implementation unmodified, also clears these batches far faster than PATH, but does not outperform the multithreaded CPU on this problem; the GPU pulls ahead only once each per-instance KKT system grows large, and we characterize this regime dependence. We describe the solver's interior point formulation, the abstraction that lets a single solver implementation run unmodified across dense, batched-sparse, and single-large linear-algebra backends, and report benchmarks against PATH on both randomly generated quadratic programs and trajectory games.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

David Fridovich-Keil. 2026-08-02. MixedComplementarityProblems.jl: A Fast, Batched, Open-Source Interior Point Solver for Mixed Complementarity Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00959

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT