SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.00987

Testing Full Quartet Consistency: Adaptive Reconstruction, Random Verification, and Constant-Query Testability

Abstract

We study dense property testing for full systems of resolved quartet topologies on $n$ taxa: determining whether a system is induced by a phylogenetic tree or is $\varepsilon$-far from every tree-induced system. Our main result is an explicit polynomial-time adaptive one-sided-error tester. It reconstructs a candidate tree through anchored quartet queries and verifies the candidate using uniformly random quartet queries. With error probability $\delta$, it uses $O\!\left(n\log n+\varepsilon^{-1}\log(1/\delta)\right)$ queries. We also give a non-adaptive cached-anchor variant using $\binom{n-1}{3}+O\!\left(\varepsilon^{-1}\log(1/\delta)\right)$ queries. Both improve the previous explicit $O(n^3/\varepsilon)$ query bound. Since the input contains $\binom{n}{4}=\Theta(n^4)$ quartet entries, both testers use $o\!\left(\binom{n}{4}\right)$ queries for fixed~$\varepsilon$ and~$\delta$. We additionally encode full quartet systems, equivariantly under relabeling, as directed, three-colored $4$-ary structures. Hereditary directed-hypergraph testing then yields an $n$-independent one-sided-error tester, although its dependence on $\varepsilon$ is quantitatively impractical. Finally, we prove lower bounds. In ordinary property testing, every adaptive randomized tester, even with two-sided error, requires asymptotically at least $\ln((1-\delta)/\delta)/\ln(1/(1-\varepsilon))$ queries as $n\to\infty$. Every one-sided-error tester requires $\ln(1/\delta)/\ln(1/(1-\varepsilon))$ queries, matching the random-verification term up to rounding. For the stronger reconstruct-or-reject task, our upper bounds are optimal up to constant factors: the adaptive and non-adaptive complexities are $\Theta(n\log n+\varepsilon^{-1}\log(1/\delta))$ and $\Theta(n^3+\varepsilon^{-1}\log(1/\delta))$, respectively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Chuang-Chieh Lin. 2026-08-02. Testing Full Quartet Consistency: Adaptive Reconstruction, Random Verification, and Constant-Query Testability. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00987

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS