Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.02159

Minimal-to-Maximal Conversion Search Is Not Output-Polynomial

Bennet Hörmann·Martin Schirneck
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Transversal Hypergraph problem is to enumerate (list) all inclusion-wise minimal hitting sets of a given hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$. It is the most important open question in enumeration whether this problem admits an output-polynomial algorithm whose running time scales polynomially with the size of $\mathcal{H}$ and the number of solutions. Currently, Minimal-to-Maximal Conversion Search (MMCS) by Murakami and Uno [DAM 2014] is the most efficient algorithm for real-world instances, but there are no worst-case performance guarantees known for it. We prove that MMCS is in fact not output-polynomial. The lower bound construction motivates a more detailed analysis of how certain heuristic choices in the algorithm design affect the running time. We conduct a thorough analysis of those heuristics and, based on this, propose new extension. We then show in extensive running time experiments that this new heuristic further improves practical performance.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Bennet Hörmann, Martin Schirneck. 2026-08-03. Minimal-to-Maximal Conversion Search Is Not Output-Polynomial. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02159

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗