Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.03121

From Convex to Non-convex: Evolution of Rarefaction-dispersive shock interactions and the Influence of Non-convexity

Jia-Xue Niu·Rui Guo·Hua-Ying Ren·Ya-Hui Huang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the analytical description of the interaction between a rarefaction and dispersive shock wave across both convex and non-convex cases, with particular attention to the effect of the non-convexity, within the framework of the Gardner equation. For convex structures, internal oscillations degenerate into small amplitude harmonic waves or a modulated soliton train as t tends to infinity, accompanied by either a retained rarefaction part, or a new dispersive shock wave emanating from it. Taking into account the non-convexity, when alpha>0, we find that kinks either remain non-participating in the interaction at all, or only act to switch polarities of convex structures. As for alpha<0, we solve the Gardner-Whitham equations with three varying Riemann invariants, to analyze the rarefaction-contact dispersive shock interaction where the only possible configuration is that the rarefaction wave is on the left. It is demonstrated that the rarefaction wave will be completely drawn into the interaction region, with a changed contact dispersive shock wave escaping from the left. And internal oscillations eventually degenerate into an asymptotic algebraic soliton train as t tends to infinity. In addition, we study the interaction between a rarefaction wave and composite structure consisting of the contact and classical dispersive shock parts under two distinct situations: (i) For the composite structure-rarefaction interaction, the contact part remains inactive in the interaction, and internal oscillations ultimately degenerate into a contact dispersive shock wave. (ii) For the rarefaction-composite structure case, the entire composite structure participates in the interaction, during

Explore related subjects

math-phmath.MP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jia-Xue Niu, Rui Guo, Hua-Ying Ren, Ya-Hui Huang. 2026-08-04. From Convex to Non-convex: Evolution of Rarefaction-dispersive shock interactions and the Influence of Non-convexity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.03121

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗