SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.06645

Causal Invariance of the Contact Number of Pseudo-Riemannian Submanifolds

Abstract

Let $M_s^n$ be a non-degenerate pseudo-Riemannian submanifold of a pseudo-Euclidean space with indefinite induced metric. Restricting the contact condition to spacelike or to timelike tangent directions gives two a priori different one-sided contact numbers. We prove that, for every prescribed order, ordinary, spacelike and timelike contact are equivalent; consequently, the three contact numbers coincide. The proof is inductive. A one-sided contact hypothesis first yields higher-order orthogonality identities for the iterated covariant derivatives of the second fundamental form. Their diagonal scalar expressions are then extended from either unit pseudo-sphere to the whole tangent space by a polynomial argument, and a second induction proves causal invariance. We also construct an explicit Lorentzian surface in $\mathbb E_4^8$ whose ordinary, spacelike and timelike contact numbers are all equal to six, and place the infinite-contact limit in the semi-Riemannian theory of geodesic normal sections and helical immersions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Juan S. Gómez. 2026-08-06. Causal Invariance of the Contact Number of Pseudo-Riemannian Submanifolds. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06645

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The $q$-deformed cross-ratio: modular invariants and Coxeter friezes

We introduce and study a scalar $q$-deformation of the cross-ratio on $\mathbb P^1(\mathbb Q)$. Our construction is based on the notion of $q$-deformed rational numbers due to Morier-Genoud and the author. The $q$-cross-ratio is invariant under $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$, while elements of determinant $-1$ of $\mathrm{PGL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$ act by $q\mapsto q^{-1}$. A principal result is its relation to $q$-deformed Coxeter friezes associated with rational polygons. The expansion at $q=e^h$ yields an algebraically independent sequence of modular invariants and relative invariants, although this sequence does not separate modular orbits. We compute the first two nonconstant coefficients of this expansion explicitly.

math.DG

The Cartan-Hadamard conjecture in dimension five

We show that the sharp Euclidean isoperimetric inequality holds for domains in complete simply connected Riemannian $5$-manifolds of nonpositive sectional curvature, which establishes the Cartan-Hadamard conjecture in that dimension. The main step is a sharp inequality for constant-mean-curvature hypersurfaces, proved via integrals over pairs of boundary points, in the spirit of Banchoff-Pohl, together with an estimate for Jacobi fields along geodesic chords. The inequality persists for boundaries of isoperimetric regions in geodesic balls, whose mean curvature is constant only on the free part. An isoperimetric-profile argument, after Kleiner, completes the proof. Our method also gives a new proof in dimension $3$.

math.DG

On static manifolds with boundary admitting a nowhere-vanishing static potential

We study complete static manifolds with boundary admitting a nowhere-vanishing static potential. Our main result shows that, under a natural lower bound relating the scalar curvature and the boundary mean curvature, a simple static manifold with boundary must in fact have positive scalar curvature, negative boundary mean curvature, and be compact; we also obtain explicit relations and estimates involving the volume of the manifold and the geometry of its boundary. In the scalar-flat case, we prove global splitting and Ricci-flat rigidity results, including for disconnected boundary, while in the negative scalar curvature case we establish a sharp mean-curvature bound and characterize the equality case by an exponential warped-product structure. The proofs rely essentially on the study of the associated Einstein manifold. In appendix we derive several identities for static manifolds with boundary and discuss the associated Einstein manifold technique in the boundaryless setting.

math.DG