SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.07124

Near-Optimal Replacement Path Coverings

Abstract

Let $L$ and $f$ be positive integers. An $(L,f)$-replacement path covering (RPC) for a graph $G$ is a family $\mathcal{G}$ of subgraphs such that, for every set $F$ of at most $f$ edges, there is a subfamily $\mathcal{G}_F \subseteq \mathcal{G}$ with the following properties. (1) No subgraph in $\mathcal{G}_F$ contains an edge of $F$. (2) For each pair of vertices $s,t$ that have a shortest path in $G{-}F$ with at most $L$ edges, one such path also exists in some subgraph in $\mathcal{G}_F$. The total number $|\mathcal{G}|$ of subgraphs is called the covering value. RPCs are an important tools in the design of fault-tolerant data structures. Weimann and Yuster [TALG 2013] presented an RPC with covering value $\widetilde{O}(f L^f)$. Karthik and Parter [TALG 2024] showed that $\Omega( (L/f)^f )$ subgraphs are necessary. Recently, Bil\`o, Chechik, Choudhary, Cohen, and Schirneck [ICALP 2026] devised a new approach for very small sensitivities $f = o(\log L)$ with covering value $\widetilde{O}(f e^f (L/f)^{f+o(1)})$. They also showed that any RPC in the complementary range $f = \Omega(\log L)$ must contain $\Omega( (\sqrt{f e^f}/L) \cdot (L/f)^f)$ subgraphs. This left open the question of what is the true covering value. We give two surprisingly simple constructions that improve both the upper and lower bound. This results in a near-tight covering value of $\widetilde{\Theta}(\frac{(L+f)^{L+f}}{L^L f^f}) \cdot \mathsf{poly}(f)$ for the much wider range of $f = O(L)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Davide Bilò, Keerti Choudhary, Sarel Cohen, Martin Schirneck. 2026-08-07. Near-Optimal Replacement Path Coverings. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07124

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS