arXiv · 2608.07338
An Explicit Five-Variable Counterexample to the Generalized Vanishing Conjecture
Abstract
We give an explicit counterexample in five variables to the Generalized Vanishing Conjecture. The construction is motivated by the recent counterexample to the Mathieu conjecture for SU(2). In the polynomial ring C[a,b,c,d,t], set P = (t+c)(ad+bt), Q = c, and let {\Lambda} = d/dt (d/da d/dd - d/db d/dc). We prove that {\Lambda}^m(P^m) = 0 for every m >= 1, whereas for every m >= 2, {\Lambda}^m(QP^m) = (-1)^m (m!)^2 (m+1)! t, which is nonzero. Thus the Generalized Vanishing Conjecture fails in dimension 5.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Alexander Dvorsky. 2026-08-07. An Explicit Five-Variable Counterexample to the Generalized Vanishing Conjecture. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07338
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.