SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.08013

A Simple Analysis of Quadratic Probing and Other Open Addressing Schemes

Abstract

In open addressed hashing, quadratic probing is attractive for striking a nice balance between having a high locality of reference and a low number of probes per search. However, these are empirical observations, not theoretical guarantees. Indeed, until recently, it was not known whether quadratic probing had constant expected insertion cost under any positive load factor $\alpha > 0$, even with uniformly random hash functions. In a recent breakthrough---albeit a numerically understated breakthrough---Kuszmaul and Xi (2024) proved that any fixed offset sequence (including quadratic probing) does, in fact, have constant expected insertion cost for load factors $\alpha \leq 8.9\%$. This is well below what we would like to prove, that quadratic probing has constant insertion cost for any load factor $\alpha < 1-\epsilon$ bounded away from 1. In this paper, we prove that open addressed hashing with any fixed offset sequence has constant expected insertion cost for load factors up to $35.74\%$, and that for quadratic probing in particular, we can increase the load factor to $37.61\%$. Our main innovation is a new type of witness forest for recording collisions among the probe sequences.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yuhao Guo, Seth Pettie, Chengzhang Wan. 2026-08-08. A Simple Analysis of Quadratic Probing and Other Open Addressing Schemes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.08013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS