SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.08017

Existence and computation of monomial families of near-optimal strategies for recursive games

Abstract

In a finite recursive game in the sense of Everett, both players have stationary epsilon-optimal strategies for every epsilon>0. Frederiksen and Miltersen strengthened this result by showing that the strategies for all sufficiently small epsilon can be encoded by finitely many monomials: at every state, all but possibly one of the action probabilities are constants times integer powers of epsilon. The resulting finite symbolic object specifies a strategy for every sufficiently small accuracy. Their proof uses semialgebraic selection and Puiseux series. We give an alternative elementary proof of this regularity theorem for recursive games. We start with stationary strategies that guarantee vectors approaching the value through Everett's one-sided region. After fixing their support, we express, for each pure stationary reply, all absorption probabilities as quotients of directed-forest polynomials with nonnegative coefficients and a common positive denominator. Each payoff is a fixed signed linear combination of these quotients. We then compress the asymptotic orders of the finitely many forest monomials into one integer weight vector. This proof uses neither semialgebraic selection nor Puiseux series. Furthermore, for rational games with a fixed number N of active states, we present a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm that computes a monomial family exactly. It returns all algebraic coefficients in one ordered real univariate representation. The representation length and running time are at most L^{(N+1)^{O(N)}}, where L is the input length.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Peter Bro Miltersen. 2026-08-08. Existence and computation of monomial families of near-optimal strategies for recursive games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.08017

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT