SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.08488

Efficient Bayesian calibration of many-parameter system models

Abstract

Computer models of complex engineering systems rely on proper tuning of their model parameters to ensure accurate predictions of the system behavior. The challenge of effectively calibrating many-parameter models is the difficulty of sampling in high-dimensional spaces and the computational expense of generating a large number of samples to characterize the calibrated parameter distributions. The method of active subspaces has been shown to be effective at constructing low-dimensional latent spaces for Bayesian inverse problems when the misfit function (i.e., negative log-likelihood) is treated as the function of interest. On the other hand, works that implement surrogate modeling for inference often focus on approximating the predictive model itself. In this work, an integrated dimension reduction and surrogate modeling framework for efficient and robust model calibration based on the Kennedy O'Hagan framework is proposed, with the following key components. First, an active subspace of the misfit function is identified. Then, a surrogate model for the misfit is constructed in this low-dimensional latent space. Care is taken to ensure that the assumed probabilistic structure of the misfit surrogate is compatible with the structure imposed on the misfit by the observation noise and computer model discrepancy. Further, a generalized likelihood function is defined that can account for the misfit surrogate uncertainty along with the other usual sources of uncertainty, e.g., experimental noise, model inadequacy, etc. This general formulation is shown to be valid for surrogates of any deterministic bijective function of the original likelihood, not just the misfit. Finally, a strategy for incorporating the uncertainty in identifying the active subspace is included.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Promit Chakroborty, Sankaran Mahadevan. 2026-08-09. Efficient Bayesian calibration of many-parameter system models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.08488

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME