SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.08681

Formal squares over the unit square separate FS-domains from RB-domains

Abstract

Every RB-domain is an FS-domain. Whether the converse holds was a long-standing open problem. We prove that the domain of closed axis-parallel squares in the plane whose centres lie in the unit square $[0,1]^2$, with the whole plane adjoined and ordered by reverse inclusion, is an FS-domain but not an RB-domain. The proof is quantitative. A finite-grid argument first shows that, on every finite slab $[0,1]^2\times[0,m]$, for every approximate identity and every $\varepsilon>0$, one member of the approximate identity has radius excess (i.e., the output radius minus the input radius) uniformly at most $\varepsilon$. By contrast, for every deflation and every $m>0$, the radius excess is at least $m/(4m+1)$ at some point of the slab $[0,1]^2\times[0,m]$. This solution was obtained independently of the recent work of Chen, Kou, and Lyu and uses a different method.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Marco Abbadini. 2026-08-09. Formal squares over the unit square separate FS-domains from RB-domains. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.08681

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN