Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.09061

Breaking the 4-Approximation Barrier in Strategyproof Two-Facility Location

Mengfan Ma·Bo Peng
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study strategyproof mechanism design without transfers for the two-facility location problem in metric spaces. A mechanism selects two facility locations based on agents' reported locations; each agent incurs her distance to the nearer facility, and the objective is to minimize the expected social cost. A mechanism is strategyproof if no agent ever benefits from misreporting her location. The best approximation ratio achieved by a randomized strategyproof mechanism has been $4$, attained by the Proportional mechanism of Lu, Sun, Wang, and Zhu (EC 2010), and the best lower bound has been $1.045$, due to Lu, Wang, and Zhou (WINE 2009). Neither bound has moved since then, even on the line $\mathbb{R}$. We improve both bounds. Our main result is a randomized strategyproof mechanism with approximation ratio $11/3 \approx 3.667$ on every Ptolemaic metric space, a rich class containing all Euclidean spaces. The mechanism randomizes between the Proportional mechanism and a new mechanism that we call Global Pair. Global Pair draws an unordered pair of agents with probability proportional to their distance and opens facilities at their reported locations. Although Global Pair and Proportional each have approximation ratio $4$, the two mechanisms attain their worst-case approximation ratios on complementary instances. Randomizing between them balances these complementary weaknesses and breaks the $4$-approximation barrier. On the lower-bound side, we construct a new two-profile instance that yields a lower bound of $(1+\sqrt{2})/2 \approx 1.207$, improving upon the previous lower bound of $1.045$.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mengfan Ma, Bo Peng. 2026-08-10. Breaking the 4-Approximation Barrier in Strategyproof Two-Facility Location. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09061

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗