Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.09699

Full-Key Recovery and Forgery from One MQOM v2.1 Signature

José Luis Delgado
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We give a full-key-recovery attack on MQOM v2.1, a Round-3 candidate in the NIST additional-signature process, that recovers the complete signing key from one accepted signature and uses it to sign a fresh message. If $\delta=\operatorname{FirstBits}_{\lambda}(x)$ is the prefix of the witness $x$, the sibling path determines a public value $A$ such that tree parity gives $s=\delta\oplus A$. Substitution into the hidden-leaf commitment yields $$\mathsf{Enc}_K(\delta\oplus A)=T\oplus\mathsf{LinOrtho}(\delta)$$ with public values $K$ and $T$. The correction in the same signature expands a solution into a complete witness, while the public MQ relation identifies those yielding valid signing keys; serializing such a witness gives the secret key, enabling a fresh-message signature accepted by the reference verifier. We evaluate this equation over the specified AES/Rijndael circuits using retained circuit state along a Gray traversal. Complete-domain scans for Categories I and V cost $2^{142.335112}$ and $2^{271.794162}$ Boolean gates. Category-III scans cover $1/2+2^{-20}$ and $0.580004770183$ of the domain at costs of $2^{206.774558}$ and $2^{206.988685}$ gates. All four totals are below the NIST security benchmarks. Reduced-domain runs against the reference implementation recover the byte-exact witness and key in all three categories and produce a fresh-message forgery accepted by the reference verifier. Independently generated source-syntax circuits evaluate the fixed ciphers over the stated domains and translated L3 prefixes, while an exact ideal-cipher factorial-moment bound controls additional equation preimages passed to public-key validation. Every value in the equation is fixed by the accepted transcript, so salt-bound global-root expansion changes its public constants without removing the one-signature recovery channel.

Explore related subjects

cs.CR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

José Luis Delgado. 2026-08-10. Full-Key Recovery and Forgery from One MQOM v2.1 Signature. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09699

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks on NLP Text Classifiers: A Baseline Study on SST-2

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) try to determine whether a specific record was used to train a model, a privacy risk that matters in natural language processing (NLP), where training data can contain sensitive user text. This paper presents a controlled benchmark of membership inference vulnerability for text classification on the GLUE SST-2 sentiment dataset. A TF-IDF + Logistic Regression pipeline and a fine-tuned DistilBERT classifier are compared under a loss-threshold MIA, with utility measured by development accuracy and macro F1. DistilBERT reached 0.9466 accuracy and 0.9460 macro F1 against 0.8756 and 0.8727 for Logistic Regression, yet both models leaked membership signal (Attack AUC 0.5615 and 0.5800, respectively). Two mitigations were tested. Stronger regularization reduced leakage for Logistic Regression at a visible utility cost, whereas fine-tuning DistilBERT for 2 epochs instead of 3 reduced leakage with negligible accuracy loss. Lightweight training adjustments can improve the privacy-utility trade-off without complex defenses.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Data Poisoning Attacks in Supervised Learning

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has emerged as a rapidly growing blockchain-based financial service, where market transaction dynamics and underlying smart contract logic are intricately intertwined. This autonomous interplay, while eliminating centralized intermediaries, significantly expands the vulnerability surface of DeFi protocols to Price Manipulation Attacks (PMAs), which have already inflicted catastrophic financial losses. Despite their gravity, existing detection paradigms suffer from fundamental limitations. Transaction-centric methods lack awareness of contract execution semantics, making them prone to false positives under legitimate market volatility, while static contract analyses ignore real transaction behaviors and frequently report vulnerabilities that are infeasible to exploit in practice. We present DeFiFusion, a dual-modal PMA detection framework that closes this gap by jointly modeling transaction events and smart contract semantics within a unified pipeline. Our core insight is that PMA maliciousness emerges only from the interaction between transaction behaviors and the contract logic they exploit; neither signal suffices in isolation. Accordingly, we derive price-manipulation-aware event encoding for extracting fine-grained temporal and economic features tailored to manipulation patterns. We further introduce LLM-based contract semantic extraction to supply the execution-logic context that prior behavioral methods lack. To fuse these modalities, we propose a Dual-Modal Projection-Fusion Transformer with T5-style relative positional encoding, capturing the cyclic multi-stage execution structures that distinguish PMAs from benign market activity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeFiFusion consistently achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, effectively recalling 222 of the 225 PMA cases while maintaining a precision of 96.10%.

cs.CR↗