SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.10169

Predicting affective connotation of visualizations from their constituent colors

Abstract

With increasing evidence that affective connotation (emotional association) is an important aspect of visual communication, there is a need for methods to predict affective connotation of visualizations. Many aspects of visualization design, including colors, textures, and shapes, can contribute to affective connotation, and a key question is how multiple design properties combine to determine the emotion association of a whole visualization. In this study, we focused specifically on color and tested whether it is possible to predict the affective connotation of whole visualizations by aggregating the emotion associations of the individual, constituent colors (additivity hypothesis). We also tested whether accounting for the size of colored regions, as determined by the underlying dataset, improved predictions (data-dependence hypothesis). We found that for colormap data visualizations in which colors were well-distributed across all colors in the color scale, the mean estimated associations of individual colors effectively predicted emotional associations of the maps as a whole (additivity; Exp. 1). For colormaps whose underlying datasets were biased to map more to colors at one end of the color scale, emotional associations were better predicted by a weighted mean that accounted for color frequency in the colormap (data-dependence; Exp. 2). Effects of additivity and data-dependence generalized to dot plots and bar charts (Exp. 3). These results suggest it is viable to predict affective connotation of whole visualizations from their individual design components, which has important implications for automating affective visualization design to support visual communication.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Karen B. Schloss, Halle C. Braun, Kushin Mukherjee, Anna L. Chinni, Seth R. Gorelik. 2026-08-10. Predicting affective connotation of visualizations from their constituent colors. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10169

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

ShellVis: Sandboxed Live Programming for Shell Scripts

Live programming provides visibility to programmers by running and tracing programs as they are edited. However, for programs with potentially harmful side effects, liveness can turn mistakes into disasters. We propose enabling live programming in environments with side effects via sandboxing: confining effects to a simulation of the true environment. We apply sandboxed live programming in the challenging context of shell scripting: a ubiquitous and powerful---yet notoriously opaque and error-prone---tool. ShellVis provides line-by-line feedback on a shell script's run-time behavior, with file operations sandboxed via a safe overlay of the file system. A qualitative user evaluation finds ShellVis to be helpful to participants, replacing tedious existing practices and instilling confidence. Participant responses also reveal areas for future research, particularly bridging the gulf of execution alongside the gulf of evaluation. ShellVis serves as a case study of how sandboxing can bring live-programming techniques into the many real-world programming contexts where side effects are important.

cs.HC

Visual-Motion-Induced Modulation of Pedestrian Trajectories Using Spatially Distributed Multi-Display Signage in Public Spaces

Multi-display signage (MDS), now ubiquitous in urban environments, has the potential to influence human behavior and experience in public spaces. However, despite its unique capability to present spatially distributed dynamic visual stimuli, its current use is mainly limited to advertising. In this study, we propose a perception-based approach for laterally modulating pedestrian trajectories as a nonverbal means of guiding pedestrians in public spaces. The approach is motivated by vection, the illusion of self-motion, and uses laterally moving monochrome stripes, a standard stimulus in vection research, presented across spatially distributed displays to elicit postural responses that may bias pedestrian trajectories. We evaluated the approach through a controlled laboratory experiment and a real-world field deployment involving actual pedestrian flows in a national museum. The laboratory experiment examined whether the MDS setup induced trajectory shifts in the direction predicted by prior research on the behavioral effects of vection. The field deployment investigated whether comparable effects would emerge in aggregate pedestrian behavior during unconstrained movement under conditions closer to those of urban public spaces. In the laboratory, full-screen motion significantly biased walking trajectories in the direction of visual motion, whereas partial-stripe motion produced no significant directional effect. In the field deployment, opposing full-screen motion conditions produced direction-consistent differences in aggregate pedestrian positions. The field results, observed despite the substantial variability in real-world pedestrian flows, extend the controlled laboratory findings and provide ecologically valid evidence supporting practical MDS-based pedestrian modulation in public settings. The results further suggest that sufficient visual-motion coverage may be important.

cs.HC

How AI Coders Discuss, Disagree, and Reach Consensus: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Based Qualitative Coding

The utility of AI in multi-coder qualitative coding has been widely discussed, yet little empirical evidence exists to delineate the contexts in which it performs reliably. We address this gap by quantifying the effectiveness of multi-agent LLM coding across varied qualitative datasets, revealing key contextual and structural factors that mediate coding outcomes. We developed a literature-informed baseline pipeline that enables AI agents to independently code, debate, and reconcile disagreements. Results revealed that coding accuracy depends on factors such as codebook length, qualitative data similarity, and agent disagreement. Notably, intense and unresolved debates between agents led to higher accuracy. Our analysis showed that while LLMs emulate many human discussion behaviors, they lack adaptive responsiveness to context. From these findings, we offer design recommendations for building automated coding systems. Our open-source AI discussion dataset and methodological framework lay the groundwork for advancing the design of AI-mediated automated thematic analysis.

cs.HC