SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.12075

Polynomial-Time Singular Witnesses for Non-SNS Sign Patterns

Abstract

Sign-nonsingularity asks whether every real matrix with prescribed entry signs is nonsingular. Polynomial-time algorithms recognize square sign-nonsingular patterns through their connection with even directed cycles, but recognition does not itself produce an exact numerical witness in the negative case. We give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm that, for any square sign pattern $A$, either reports that $A$ is sign-nonsingular or outputs $B\in\mathbb{Z}^{n\times n}$ and $z\in\mathbb{Z}^n\setminus\{0\}$ such that $\operatorname{sgn}(B)=A$ and $Bz=0$. After normalizing a perfect matching, an even directed cycle yields two determinant terms of opposite signs. Making either term dominant produces endpoint realizations with opposite determinant signs. Changing their magnitudes one coordinate at a time exposes an affine sign-changing step, whose zero is rational; clearing its denominator gives the integer witness. Entries of $B$ have $O(n^2\log n)$ bits, and entries of $z$ have $O(n^3\log n)$ bits. The result settles Conjecture 14.12.4 in the Handbook of Satisfiability.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tao Jiang, Minbo Gao, Shaowei Cai. 2026-08-12. Polynomial-Time Singular Witnesses for Non-SNS Sign Patterns. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12075

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS