SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.14947

RETRACE: Resilience-Guided Trait-Conditioned Craving Estimation from Wearable Physiology in Opioid Use Disorder

Abstract

Detecting opioid craving from wearable physiological signals is critical yet difficult, with the potential to support proactive interventions for individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). This challenge is especially pronounced under subject-independent evaluation because craving is subjective, heterogeneous, and often physiologically entangled with stress. Our empirical analysis shows that stress elicits strong and reproducible autonomic responses, while craving-related signals are weaker, sparse, and largely embedded within stress-related physiology. We further show that psychological resilience, which shapes stress regulation and craving vulnerability, is not reliably observable from short-term wearable windows, but can be captured through reusable subject-level proxies, including post-stress heart-rate recovery and autobiographical memory recall. Motivated by these findings, we introduce RETRACE, a resilience-guided trait-conditioned framework for subject-independent craving estimation from wearable physiology. RETRACE reframes craving detection as trait-conditioned physiological interpretation: rather than assuming the same physiological pattern has the same meaning across individuals, it uses resilience-related subject context to guide inference. Technically, RETRACE introduces a novel dual-encoder design that separates generalizable stress physiology from subject-specific craving interpretation. It combines a frozen stress-pretrained encoder with resilience-conditioned craving encoder, using feature-level gating and representation-level fusion to enable lightweight personalization without target-user craving labels or per-user retraining. We evaluate RETRACE on a novel multimodal OUD dataset containing wearable physiology, stress and craving annotations, and autobiographical narratives. Under LOSO setup, RETRACE achieves up to 7% absolute improvement over the strongest baseline.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yi Xiao, Harshit Sharma, Dessa Bergen-Cico, Asif Salekin. 2026-08-15. RETRACE: Resilience-Guided Trait-Conditioned Craving Estimation from Wearable Physiology in Opioid Use Disorder. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14947

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI