SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.15172

Do You Have My Size In Stock? Assortment and Inventory Optimization Under the Consider-Fit-Then-Choose Choice Model

Abstract

In apparel retail and other applications, when a customer's preferred size is unavailable, demand may shift to nearby sizes. This substitution creates new assortment and inventory optimization challenges by coupling product availability and demand across sizes. We introduce the consider-fit-then-choose (CFTC) model to capture such size-dependent choice behavior. Products may be offered in multiple sizes, which affect customer preferences and consideration sets through fit, measured by distance from the customer's ideal size. We study assortment optimization and show-all inventory selection, in which the retailer chooses initial inventory and subsequently offers every in-stock product. We show that assortment optimization under the CFTC model is NP-hard and develop a PTAS when customers deviate by at most $O(1)$ sizes from their ideal size. Combined with the recent black-box framework of Fu et al. (2026), this yields a nearly $0.272$-approximation for show-all inventory selection. We next exploit the specific choice dynamics of the CFTC model. By stocking only every other size, we decouple demand across stocked sizes and reduce CFTC to a special class of mixed multinomial logit models that we prove satisfies the convex chain decomposition (CCD) property of Goyal et al. (2023). For the fluid problem, we develop a polynomial-time $(1/2-\epsilon)$-approximation under adjacent-size substitution and a mild condition on preference weights. For the stochastic problem, we establish an asymptotic $1/2$-approximation using a new coupling argument connecting the stochastic inventory process to its fluid counterpart. Numerical experiments calibrated using footwear data show small optimality gaps across a broad range of substitution patterns and problem settings.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yi-Chun Akchen, Kaan Cakiroglu, Felipe Caro, Jacob Feldman. 2026-08-15. Do You Have My Size In Stock? Assortment and Inventory Optimization Under the Consider-Fit-Then-Choose Choice Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15172

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Deterministic and Random Bipartite Matching on General Networks: Convex Flow Reformulation, Asymptotic Properties, and Fast Algorithms

Minimum-distance bipartite matching on general networks has numerous applications various fields. This paper first focuses on deterministic problems and presents an exact edgewise-separable convex-flow reformulation. By introducing a smooth monotone rearrangement approximation of the edge-wise imbalance profiles, the convex-flow reformulation's can be solved efficiently. If we further conduct a first-order resistance-based approximation of the convex program, a one-step Laplacian-based estimator can be analytically derived in closed forms. The paper also studies random problems where supply and demand points are randomly distributed. We show that the expected optimal matching distance scales with the square root of the number of points if the supply/demand point distributions are identical, or linearly otherwise. In the former case, the optimal flow is proven to be centered, symmetric, and sub-Gaussian. In the latter case, the limiting resistance network characterizes how supply-demand imbalance is redistributed and motivates a fast algorithm that approximate the optimal flow based on the limiting resistance. Numerical experiments show that the proposed estimators closely approximate the exact matching cost while substantially reducing computation time. The proven theoretical properties of the random matching solution are numerically verified by large-scale Monte Carlo simulations.

math.OC

Conformal-DRO: Distributionally Robust Optimization with Conformalized Ambiguity Set

Data-driven distributionally robust optimization (DRO) typically treats the conditional outcome law as fixed and uses ambiguity sets to capture estimation error. This paper studies latent distributional heterogeneity, where each instance has an unobserved law but contributes only one observation, so uncertainty persists even if the mixture law is known. We propose Conformal-DRO, which uses nested conformal regions to construct an ambiguity set for the future latent law. Under exchangeability, the set covers this law with probability at least $1-\alpha$ in finite samples, without estimating underlying latent laws or their mixing mechanism. The conformal path induces a data-driven transport geometry, while $\alpha$ determines the radius. The worst-case problem reduces to a finite linear program over conformal shells and admits sparse adversarial solutions. The resulting robust value provides a finite-sample certificate for the selected decision's expected cost.

math.OC

The best approximation tuple: an extension of the Cheney-Goldstein algorithm and results to the multiple sets case

In this paper we extend the algorithm and several results published in the celebrated 1959 paper of Cheney and Goldstein about the best approximation pair (BAP) problem in two separate directions. One is the consideration of more than two sets. The other is the ability to handle each set as an intersections of a finite family of sets. We call the resulting problem the "Best Approximation Tuple (BAT) problem". The fundamental observation that leads to this generalizations is to recognize and handle one set (the "pivot set") as different from the remaining sets (the "satellite sets") instead of seeking cycles as the minimizers of a target functional. This enable us to overcome a certain theoretical obstacle related to cycles and minimizers of general functionals. We prove the convergence of the algorithm to the unique solution of the problem in the Euclidean case with strictly convex and compact satellite sets. Because of the lack of Fej\'er monotonicity, our convergence analysis is not standard, and is based on almost unknown properties of orthogonal projections regarding equality and inequality in the definition of nonexpansiveness.

math.OC