arXiv · 2608.15525
New lower bounds on domination--packing ratios in connected subcubic and cubic graphs
Abstract
For a graph \(G\), let \(\gamma(G)\) and \(\rho(G)\) denote its domination number and packing number, respectively. Let \(c_{\mathrm{sub}}\) and \(c_{\mathrm{cub}}\) denote the respective limsups of \(\gamma(G)/\rho(G)\) over connected subcubic and connected cubic graphs as \(\rho(G)\to\infty\). We prove \[ c_{\mathrm{sub}}\geq\frac{13}{6}, \qquad c_{\mathrm{cub}}\geq\frac{17}{8}, \] by constructing two explicit binary branching families. The connected noncubic subcubic graphs \(\widehat B_t^\star\) satisfy \[ |V(\widehat B_t^\star)|=76\cdot2^t-12,\qquad \gamma(\widehat B_t^\star)=26\cdot2^t-4,\qquad \rho(\widehat B_t^\star)=12\cdot2^t-2, \] whereas the connected cubic graphs \(\widehat B_t^\bullet\) satisfy \[ |V(\widehat B_t^\bullet)|=108\cdot2^t-14,\qquad \gamma(\widehat B_t^\bullet)=34\cdot2^t-4,\qquad \rho(\widehat B_t^\bullet)=16\cdot2^t-2. \] The constructions use the same binary connector composition and closing lemma, with different connectors and initial assemblies. As a consequence, both families give unbounded additive violations of \(\gamma(G)\leq2\rho(G)+1\), disproving the proposed inequality even for connected cubic graphs.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
JiSun Huh, Juho Kim. 2026-08-16. New lower bounds on domination--packing ratios in connected subcubic and cubic graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15525
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.