SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.15750

S2a-reducibility and differentiation in Martin-L\"of random reals

Abstract

Solovay reducibility is studied intensively as a tool to compare the approximability and the degree of randomness of left-c.e. reals. By definition, a real is left-c.e. if it has a left-c.e. approximation, that is, it is the limit of an effective nondecreasing sequence of rationals. If reals $\alpha$ and $\beta$ have left-c.e. approximations $a_0, a_1, \ldots$ and $b_0, b_1, \ldots$, respectively, such that the approximation ratios \[ \frac{\alpha-a_n}{\beta-b_n} \] are bounded from above by a constant, the real $\alpha$ is Solovay reducible to $\beta$. The latter is the case for any such $\alpha$ and $\beta$ and their left-c.e. approximations whenever $\beta$ is Martin-L\"of random by the Ku\v{c}era-Slaman Theorem [DOI:10.1137/S0097539799357441]. This result was substantially strengthened by Barmpalias and Lewis-Pye [DOI:10.1016/j.jcss.2017.06.002], who demonstrated that, under the given assumptions, the approximation ratios are not only bounded but actually converge to a limit, which does not depend on the considered left-c.e. approximations. There is a quest for a suitable extension of Solovay reducibility to the class of all reals. Promising candidates include S2a-reducibility on the set of computably approximable reals by Zheng and Rettinger [DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-27798-9_39] and monotone Solovay reducibility by Titov [DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-95908-0_33]. For the latter, Titov [DOI:10.1017/jsl.2025.10157] demonstrated that the theorems of Ku\v{c}era and Slaman and of Barmpalias and Lewis-Pye extend to all reals. He conjectured further [DOI:10.1017/jsl.2025.10157, Conjecture 3.2] that similar extensions hold for S2a-reducibility in terms of its functional characterization by Kumabe, Miyabe, and Suzuki [DOI:10.3233/COM-230486]. In this work, we refute this conjecture by proving that the analogue of the Barmpalias-Lewis-Pye Limit Theorem does not hold for S2a-reducibility.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Georgii Sirotenko, Ivan Titov. 2026-08-16. S2a-reducibility and differentiation in Martin-L\"of random reals. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15750

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO