SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.16123

A Simple Las Vegas Algorithm for Sparse Nonnegative Convolution

Abstract

Let $A, B \in \mathbb{Z}_{\ge 0}^n$ be nonnegative vectors and let $t = |\operatorname{supp}(A \star B)|$. We give a Las Vegas algorithm that computes $A \star B$ in $O(t \log t)$ expected time. More generally, for every $0 < \delta \le \frac{1}{2}$, the algorithm terminates within $O(t \log t \log \frac{1}{\delta})$ time with probability at least $1 - \delta$. The algorithm uses dense convolution, linear hashing, and the length reduction of \cite{BFN22}. Its main ingredient is a carry-free representation of the indices as vectors of constant dimension $d$ whose coordinates have size $O(t / \log t)$. We can then take our hash function to be the inner product with a random element of $\mathbb{F}_p^d$ for a prime $p$ of size $\Omega(t / \log t)$: this preserves addition and gives collision probability exactly $1/p$, while identities regarding the moments of the vectors identify and recover the isolated terms as in \cite{BFN22}. Our expected running time matches that of Jin and Xu~\cite{JX24} while using substantially different tools and yielding a simpler algorithm. Note that their algorithm also terminates within $O(t \log t)$ time with probability at least $1 - \frac{1}{t}$, while our tail bound is weaker.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Trevor Vaughn. 2026-08-17. A Simple Las Vegas Algorithm for Sparse Nonnegative Convolution. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16123

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS