SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.17112

Group Theory in School Mathematics? Teaching Permutation Cycles Through the 15-Puzzle

Abstract

Permutation cycles are generally associated with undergraduate abstract algebra. This exploratory study examined whether students in Grades 5-11 could construct and use cycle representations in the context of the 15-puzzle. After a 45-minute teacher-guided lesson moving from puzzle manipulation to arrow diagrams and cycle notation, 313 students analyzed one of two new configurations - one solvable and one unsolvable - and used a supplied rule to classify it. Of these students, $78.3\%$ constructed a correct cycle representation, and $67.7\%$ both constructed the representation correctly and reached the correct classification. Cycle-construction accuracy was similar for the two configurations, but classification was less often correct for the unsolvable configuration. The findings concern immediate, supported performance rather than full understanding of permutation cycles or group theory. Nevertheless, they show that many students could use cycle representations after brief instruction and that constructing the representation and using it to reach a conclusion were separate demands. One reason to teach permutations is that, as finite, discrete, non-formulaic functions, they can extend students' experience of functions beyond familiar formulae and continuous graphs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bence Torma, Tamás Waldhauser. 2026-08-17. Group Theory in School Mathematics? Teaching Permutation Cycles Through the 15-Puzzle. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17112

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO