Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.17355

FlowShield: cryptocurrency anti-money laundering with transaction semantics parsing and fund flow tracking

Qishuang Fu·Andreas Deppeler·Joseph K. Liu·Yixin Liu·Shirui Pan·Qin Wang·Weiqing Wang·Tsz Hon Yuen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Cryptocurrency anti-money laundering (Crypto AML) is increasingly challenged by sophisticated laundering behaviors that rapidly fragment stolen assets through diverse semantics and across multiple blockchains. Existing Crypto AML methods often simplify transaction semantics, rely on topology-centric signals, or output isolated detection labels. In this paper, we present \textsc{FlowShield}, a Crypto AML framework for transaction-level laundering detection and investigator-facing report generation. \textsc{FlowShield} first recovers behavior-level semantics from observable relations, making laundering intents explicit. To trace value provenance and redistribution, \textsc{FlowShield} reconstructs fund-flow subgraphs from three complementary perspectives. It then employs a text--structure fusion mechanism, enabling the interplay between large language model (LLM)-encoded semantics and flow texts with graph convolutional network (GCN)-encoded structure. Beyond mere detection, \textsc{FlowShield} further generates readable suspicious activity reports (SARs), offering investigators concise summaries and explainable red flags. To address the data scarcity in multi-chain detection, we construct and open-source \textit{BybitML}, the first public multi-chain laundering dataset. We evaluate \textsc{FlowShield} on \textit{BybitML} and two public laundering datasets and experimental results demonstrate that \textsc{FlowShield} achieves the best overall performance, with an average F1 score of 98.0\%. Further behavior and SAR analyses demonstrate that \textsc{FlowShield} can reveal diverse laundering strategies and produce readable reports for investigating complex multi-hop fund flows.

Explore related subjects

cs.CRcs.CEcs.CY

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Qishuang Fu, Andreas Deppeler, Joseph K. Liu, Yixin Liu, Shirui Pan, Qin Wang, Weiqing Wang, Tsz Hon Yuen. 2026-08-18. FlowShield: cryptocurrency anti-money laundering with transaction semantics parsing and fund flow tracking. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17355

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks on NLP Text Classifiers: A Baseline Study on SST-2

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) try to determine whether a specific record was used to train a model, a privacy risk that matters in natural language processing (NLP), where training data can contain sensitive user text. This paper presents a controlled benchmark of membership inference vulnerability for text classification on the GLUE SST-2 sentiment dataset. A TF-IDF + Logistic Regression pipeline and a fine-tuned DistilBERT classifier are compared under a loss-threshold MIA, with utility measured by development accuracy and macro F1. DistilBERT reached 0.9466 accuracy and 0.9460 macro F1 against 0.8756 and 0.8727 for Logistic Regression, yet both models leaked membership signal (Attack AUC 0.5615 and 0.5800, respectively). Two mitigations were tested. Stronger regularization reduced leakage for Logistic Regression at a visible utility cost, whereas fine-tuning DistilBERT for 2 epochs instead of 3 reduced leakage with negligible accuracy loss. Lightweight training adjustments can improve the privacy-utility trade-off without complex defenses.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Data Poisoning Attacks in Supervised Learning

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has emerged as a rapidly growing blockchain-based financial service, where market transaction dynamics and underlying smart contract logic are intricately intertwined. This autonomous interplay, while eliminating centralized intermediaries, significantly expands the vulnerability surface of DeFi protocols to Price Manipulation Attacks (PMAs), which have already inflicted catastrophic financial losses. Despite their gravity, existing detection paradigms suffer from fundamental limitations. Transaction-centric methods lack awareness of contract execution semantics, making them prone to false positives under legitimate market volatility, while static contract analyses ignore real transaction behaviors and frequently report vulnerabilities that are infeasible to exploit in practice. We present DeFiFusion, a dual-modal PMA detection framework that closes this gap by jointly modeling transaction events and smart contract semantics within a unified pipeline. Our core insight is that PMA maliciousness emerges only from the interaction between transaction behaviors and the contract logic they exploit; neither signal suffices in isolation. Accordingly, we derive price-manipulation-aware event encoding for extracting fine-grained temporal and economic features tailored to manipulation patterns. We further introduce LLM-based contract semantic extraction to supply the execution-logic context that prior behavioral methods lack. To fuse these modalities, we propose a Dual-Modal Projection-Fusion Transformer with T5-style relative positional encoding, capturing the cyclic multi-stage execution structures that distinguish PMAs from benign market activity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeFiFusion consistently achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, effectively recalling 222 of the 225 PMA cases while maintaining a precision of 96.10%.

cs.CR↗