SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.18496

Optimal Deterministic Fully Sparse Matrix Multiplication

Abstract

We give the first deterministic algorithm for fully sparse matrix multiplication that attains the optimal running-time exponent. This result matches the best previously known randomized algorithm running-time exponent. Given compatible matrices $A$ and $B$ over an arbitrary associative ring with identity, with $\operatorname{nnz}(A),\operatorname{nnz}(B)=O(n^{\delta_{\mathrm{in}}})$ and $\operatorname{nnz}(AB)=O(n^{\delta_{\mathrm{out}}})$, our algorithm finds the support of $AB$ and computes the product exactly in $$O\!\left(n^{\beta_R(\delta_{\mathrm{in}},\min\{\delta_{\mathrm{out}},2\delta_{\mathrm{in}}\})+\varepsilon}\right)$$ operations, where $\beta_R(\delta_{\mathrm{in}},\delta)$ denotes the maximum of $\delta_{\mathrm{in}}$ and $\omega_{\delta_{\mathrm{in}},R}(a,1,b)$ over all $a,b\in[0,1]$ satisfying $a+b=\delta$. For dense inputs over a commutative ring, this bound simplifies to $O(n^{\omega_R((\delta_{\mathrm{out}}-1)_+,1,1)+\varepsilon})$. With the current rectangular matrix multiplication bounds, this is nearly quadratic, namely $O(n^{2+\varepsilon})$, for every $\delta_\mathrm{out}\le1.321334$, improving the previous deterministic range of $\delta_{\mathrm{out}}\le 0.642668$. To prove this result, we develop a general deterministic recovery technique that finds and fixes sparse parts of an unknown matrix while keeping temporary errors in denser parts under control.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Omar Graia. 2026-08-19. Optimal Deterministic Fully Sparse Matrix Multiplication. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18496

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS