SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.18955

From Erdos Problem 1154 to a Zero One Law for Turing Ideals

Abstract

Erd\H{o}s Problem 1154 asks whether every number in $[0,1]$ occurs as the Hausdorff dimension of a subring or subfield of $\mathbb{R}$. Motivated by this problem, Liang Yu asked whether the reals of an inner model can have Hausdorff dimension strictly between zero and one when their dimension is computed in an outer model. We prove a stronger result: if $\mathcal I \subseteq 2^\omega$ is any Turing ideal, then $\dim_{\mathrm H} \mathcal I \in \{0,1\}$. Equivalently, the real-closed field whose reals have Turing degrees in $\mathcal I$ has Hausdorff dimension zero or one. The proof combines digit interleaving with the Furstenberg-set theorem of Orponen and Shmerkin.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yi Wang. 2026-08-19. From Erdos Problem 1154 to a Zero One Law for Turing Ideals. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18955

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO