SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.19123

Constant-Time Inverse Suffix Array Queries in Compact Space and Sublinear-Time Construction of Suffix Array Indexes

Abstract

For a text $T\in[0..\sigma)^n$ with $2\leq\sigma\leq n$, its suffix array orders the suffix starting positions lexicographically, while its inverse suffix array maps each position to its suffix's rank. Since compressed suffix arrays and FM-indexes appeared in 2000, a central goal has been to support both queries in $O(n\log\sigma)$ bits. Thankachan recently reduced inverse suffix array query time to $O(\log\log n/\log\log\sigma)$, but constant time remained open. We give the first inverse suffix array structure with optimal space and query time: $O(n\log\sigma)$ bits and $O(1)$ time. For binary texts, this unconditionally separates the two queries for deterministic structures, since every $O(n)$-bit suffix array structure in the cell-probe model with $\Theta(\log n)$-bit cells has worst-case query time $\Omega(\log\log n/\log\log\log n)$. Construction is a second challenge: linear time can take $\Theta(\log_{\sigma} n)$ times as long as reading the input or writing a compact index. Previously, sublinear construction was known for only one such index supporting both queries. In the word RAM with $\Theta(\log n)$-bit words, we deterministically construct the new structure and two suffix array families from the packed text in $O(n\min(1,\log\sigma/\sqrt{\log n}))$ time. For $B\geq2$, the first family uses $O(n\log\sigma(1+\log_B\log_\sigma n))$ bits and has query time $O(B(1+\log_B\log_\sigma n))$, whereas the second uses $O(Bn\log\sigma(1+\log_B\log_\sigma n))$ bits and has query time $O(1+\log_B\log_\sigma n)$. Each has peak preprocessing space bounded by its index size. For binary texts, the second family matches the deterministic cell-probe time-space lower bound whenever $B\geq(\log\log n)^{\Omega(1)}$, and, outside the slowest-query regimes, improving the deterministic construction time to $o(n/\sqrt{\log n})$ would yield an equally fast Dictionary Matching algorithm.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dominik Kempa, Tomasz Kociumaka. 2026-08-19. Constant-Time Inverse Suffix Array Queries in Compact Space and Sublinear-Time Construction of Suffix Array Indexes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19123

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS