SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.19538

A simple and practical $o(\sqrt{n})$-time algorithm for shortest paths in power law graphs

Abstract

Computing shortest paths in large graphs is, and remains, a fundamental and practically motivated problem. While many algorithms were proposed to calculate shortest path between pairs of vertices efficiently, many of them (index-based methods) require substantial preprocessing, while others (traversal-based methods) have higher time complexity. In this paper, we propose and analyze Pruned Bidirectional Search (PBS), a simple sublinear approximation algorithm for power-law graphs with parameter $\beta\in[2,3)$: our algorithm does not require any preprocessing, yet exhibits performance comparable to light index-based algorithms (of linear or sublinear index size): that is, PBS runs in time $O(n^{(1-1/\log\log n)/2})$ and, with high probability, returns a path with length within $\frac{41}{32}$ of the shortest path. Moreover, if one does allow a $n^{\Theta(2-1/\log\log n)}$-time preprocessing step, its query time improves to $n^{\Theta(1/\log\log n})$. We complement our theoretical results by experiments on both real-world and synthetic power-law graphs, which show that PBS is typically $1.84\times$-$7.76\times$ times faster than existing alternatives, while achieving an approximation ratio at most 1.05.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jiaqi Mao. 2026-08-20. A simple and practical $o(\sqrt{n})$-time algorithm for shortest paths in power law graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19538

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS