arXiv · 2608.22163
Basin-Scale Modeling of Multiple Storage Projects in the Broom Creek Formation, North Dakota, USA: Unified Model and Uncertainty Quantification
Abstract
Quantifying the interactions between neighboring projects will be essential as carbon storage operations expand in scale. However, many existing basin-scale studies are deterministic or rely on hypothetical scenarios. In addition, simulations that do not fully account for neighboring projects may suffice for initial permitting. In this study, we develop a unified basin-scale model for the Broom Creek Formation in North Dakota. The model includes a total of five (existing and planned) projects, involving 18~injection wells with a maximum potential injection rate of 30~MTPA. The unified model, constructed by integrating publicly available geological and project data, contains $44\times10^6$ cells and requires over two days to run. To enable faster simulations, we present a multilevel treatment that combines four-level nested local grid refinement, constructed through the solution of a constraint-satisfaction problem, with optimized power averaging for permeability in coarse regions. After demonstrating the accuracy of the coarse model, we use it to assess uncertainty in key quantities of interest (QoIs), including total CO$_2$ injected and plume area after 50~years, across a wide range of geological realizations and model parameters. In addition, we develop a deep learning surrogate model, which is used in global sensitivity analyses to identify dominant contributors to QoI variance. Comparisons between the unified model and standalone project simulations are presented to quantify inter-project interference. This can be substantial in some cases, e.g., for one project, the median total CO$_2$ injected decreases from 271~MT (standalone) to 192~MT (unified model).
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Keisuke Yamamura, Louis J. Durlofsky. 2026-08-23. Basin-Scale Modeling of Multiple Storage Projects in the Broom Creek Formation, North Dakota, USA: Unified Model and Uncertainty Quantification. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22163
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.