SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.22413

Beyond the Static Barrier for Ordinary Dynamic Approximate Membership

Abstract

We prove a strict space separation between static and ordinary dynamic approximate membership at every fixed error rate. For each fixed $\varepsilon\in(0,1)$, a capacity-$n$ ordinary dynamic filter over a universe of size $u$, with zero false negatives, pointwise false-positive probability at most $\varepsilon$, arbitrary history dependence, a free public random tape, and at most $H$ bits of persistent state, satisfies \[ H\ge \bigl(\log_2(1/\varepsilon)+a_\varepsilon^{\rm c}\bigr)n-o(n), \] under only $u/n\to\infty$. The constant $a_\varepsilon^{\rm c}$ is an explicit variational threshold obtained by preserving the dependence between the parent accepted mass and the successor reservoir. The structural step is a common-continuation transport lemma. A joint posterior KL bound gives a branch-specific survivor support; the same legal delete--insert word transports that support to one successor state, forcing an accepted reservoir. We then keep the parent outside mass $1-X$ in the conditional-entropy argument instead of replacing it by $1-\varepsilon$. This yields a two-variable analytic envelope, with no selected thresholds, dyadic witnesses, or numerical assumptions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Qizhi Chen, Zhebei Shen, Zhehan Yu. 2026-08-23. Beyond the Static Barrier for Ordinary Dynamic Approximate Membership. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22413

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS