Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.23040

RoboRacer Arena: Scaling High-Fidelity Autonomous Racing in Isaac Sim

Mihaela-Larisa Clement·Agnes Poks·Ezio Bartocci
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

RoboRacer offers a standardized platform for research using 1:10-scale autonomous vehicles, but the variety of available tracks hinders the process of acquiring policies. Although existing occupancy-grid simulators allow for the quick addition of new maps, they fail to include physical contact, while 3D simulators require each circuit to be implemented as a separate asset, thus limiting their scalability. In order to overcome this issue, we have developed RoboRacer Arena, a system that creates 3D racing environments directly from occupancy maps. Our method starts by using a flood fill algorithm to extract the drivable corridors and to identify the track boundaries, which are then used to establish the barriers. A distance field is calculated to define the collision boundaries. The track surfaces, collision properties, and materials are assembled into a USD stage, which allows for the automated and reproducible generation of the environment in Isaac Sim. The input maps can be obtained from SLAM sessions, from rescaled Formula 1 circuits, or from natural-language descriptions. When the input is based on natural language, we use Gemma 4 31B to generate a track specification without specifying any coordinates or geometry. To guarantee consistency and reproducibility, we apply geometric screening, procedural generation, and raster-level validation. The simulation environments are initialized in a time range of 1.18 to 2.48 seconds, with the initialization time increasing linearly as the raster size increases. In 30 matched trials involving 10 tracks and 3 seeds, 21 maps were generated and all passed validation. RoboRacer Arena currently contains 130 tracks and supports the generation of tracks from natural language. In benchmark tests, the system attains 8,707 vehicle-steps per second when using 256 parallel rigid-body vehicles, excluding the time taken for rendering and policy execution.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mihaela-Larisa Clement, Agnes Poks, Ezio Bartocci. 2026-08-24. RoboRacer Arena: Scaling High-Fidelity Autonomous Racing in Isaac Sim. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23040

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗