Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.24380

Instance-Optimality of Bidirectional Dijkstra on Simple Graphs

Christian Bertram·Mads Vestergaard Jensen·Mikkel Thorup·Hanzhi Wang·Shuyi Yan
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the shortest-path problem on graphs with positive real-valued edge weights. Given a source vertex $s$ and a target vertex $t$, the goal is to calculate the length of the shortest path from $s$ to $t$. We are particularly interested in instances that can be solved in sublinear time. Recently, Haeupler, Hlad\'ik, Rozho\v{n}, Tarjan, and T\v{e}tek proved that (a version of) the bidirectional Dijkstra's algorithm is instance-optimal on positively weighted multigraphs, both directed and undirected, considering the number of vertices and edges queried by the algorithm. However, multigraphs are not the canonical setting for the shortest-path problem. The problem is typically formulated on simple graphs without loops and parallel edges. They therefore left as an open problem whether bidirectional Dijkstra remains instance-optimal on simple weighted graphs. We answer this question, but for simple graphs, the answer is more complex, depending on the setting. We show that bidirectional Dijkstra is still instance-optimal on simple undirected weighted graphs under the order-oblivious model, where incident edges are given in a random order. In contrast, under the order-dependent model, where incident edges have a given order, we show that bidirectional Dijkstra is not instance-optimal. For simple directed weighted graphs, we show that bidirectional Dijkstra is not instance-optimal under either the order-oblivious or the order-dependent model, being off by a factor of $\Theta(m/n)$ in both cases. We further show that no algorithm can have instance-optimality ratio $o(m/n)$ under the order-dependent model, or under the order-oblivious model when $m=O(n\sqrt{n})$. On the positive side, the above results imply that bidirectional Dijkstra is instance-optimal up to logarithmic factors on all sparse directed and undirected graphs satisfying $m/n=\log^{O(1)} n$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Christian Bertram, Mads Vestergaard Jensen, Mikkel Thorup, Hanzhi Wang, Shuyi Yan. 2026-08-25. Instance-Optimality of Bidirectional Dijkstra on Simple Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24380

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗