SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.24889

Reliable LLM-Powered Decision Engines for Large-Scale Supply Chain Operations: Architecture, Safety, and Performance Guarantees

Abstract

Current large-scale supply chains are highly uncertain, dynamic, and disruption prone that are challenging to serve up timely and resilient decisions through traditional rule-based and optimization-only systems. The increasing supply of heterogeneous data sources, such as transactional demand signals and unstructured disruption report, presents a chance of intelligent systems, which could reason, adapt and optimize at the same time. A hybrid architecture that combines large language models (LLMs) with mathematical optimization, probabilistic forecasting, and safety-constrained decision filtering is proposed in this paper as a performance of a Decision Engine, which is called LLM-Powered Decision Engine (LLM-DE). In comparison to purely data-driven or heuristic solutions, LLM-DE integrates semantic reasoning with LLM with a set of performance and safety guarantees that allow safe decision-making in large-scale supply chain processes. The suggested framework enables the end-to-end decision making such as demand forecasting, inventory optimization, and transportation routing and disruption mitigation. The findings affirm that language-based reasoning combined with optimization and formal constraints can be used to come up with not only smarter but also safer and more scalable supply chain decisions. This research provides a new architecture, a complete pipeline of algorithm, and a formulation based on mathematical constructs of the operational decision systems incorporating LLM. The proposed model offers a pragmatic and theoretical basis of the next-generation intelligent supply chain infrastructures that can be implemented to work dependably in the face of uncertainty and massive complexity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nirmal Kumar Jingar. 2026-05-16. Reliable LLM-Powered Decision Engines for Large-Scale Supply Chain Operations: Architecture, Safety, and Performance Guarantees. https://doi.org/10.1109/ic_aset69920.2026.11502212

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI