SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.24941

Lobachevsky's Views of Geometry

Abstract

Lobachevsky's discovery of Non-Euclidean geometry was a byproduct of his more ambitious plan of reforming the traditional Euclid-style foundations of geometry. This project aligned with d'Alembert's and Condillac's practically-oriented visions of mathematics and aimed at closing the perceived gap between the pure mathematics, on the one hand, and the natural sciences and engineering, on the other hand. Following d'Alembert Lobachevsky deliberately avoided the axiomatic development of his geometrical theory and combined instead some preliminary intuitive synthetic constructions with their rigorous analytic treatment. In addition to Non-Euclidean geometry, Lobachevsky's project brought about an early form of Dimension theory. The paper comprises a description of the local context of Lobachevsky's works, including some pointers to Russian geometry textbooks of the beginning of the 19th century. We summarise Lobachevsky's philosophical views which motivated his mathematical achievements and show how these motivations were misunderstood and misinterpreted in the beginning of the 20th century by Henri Poincar\'e and Ernst Cassirer. Finally we argue that Lobachevsky's epistemic views remain pertinent in the context of the ongoing discussion about the reunion of mathematics and physics. The \emph{Appendix} comprises English translations of eight Lobachevsky's documents of various length and character where he expresses his general epistemic views on mathematics and, in particular, geometry.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Andrei Rodin. 2026-08-24. Lobachevsky's Views of Geometry. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24941

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO