SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.25197

Exact algorithms for optimal discretization

Abstract

The optimal discretization problem asks, given two disjoint sets of points $R$ and $B$ in the plane, for a minimal family of horizontal and vertical lines that separate the two sets, so that no cell delimited by the lines contains points from both sets. The problem arises as a pre-processing in supervised machine learning, and has received significant attention in parameterized algorithmics. Answering the question raised by Bonnet, Giannopoulos, and Lampis [IPEC 2017] and Froese [PhD thesis, 2018], it was shown by Kratsch, Masa\v{r}\'ik, Muzi, Pilipczuk, and Sorge [SODA 2021] that optimal discretization admits a fixed-parameter algorithm with running time $2^{\mathcal{O}(k^2 \log k)} \cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, where $k$ is the solution size and $n = |R| + |B|$. In this paper we give an algorithm for optimal discretization that runs in time $\mathcal{O}(1.9602^n)$. We also study the related point separation problem that asks to separate all input points by axis-parallel lines. For this problem we obtain an algorithm with runtime $\mathcal{O}(1.8906^n)$. Our guarantees follow from structural observations about bichromatic and monochromatic point sets, and hold even if points are allowed to share coordinates. To our knowledge, these are the first improvements over the trivial $2^n$ bound for both problems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

László Kozma, Junqi Tan. 2026-08-25. Exact algorithms for optimal discretization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25197

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS