SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.26488

Cheaper by the Batch: Shared Traversal for Genotype Graph Editing

Abstract

Updating a graph by inserting or replacing nodes while preserving semantics and reusing existing structure is a recurring computational problem. In population genetics, this problem arises in the genotype representation graph (GRG), a directed acyclic graph that losslessly encodes phased genetic variation across hundreds of thousands of samples by sharing subgraph structure for individual mutations. In a GRG, each mutation's carrier set is implicitly encoded as the set of leaf nodes reachable from the node it is assigned to. Updating a mutation is therefore a structural editing problem, and current approaches remap mutations individually. This paper introduces a batched mutation-remapping algorithm that replaces independent reuse-aware traversals with a single shared reverse-topological pass, identifying reuse candidates for an entire batch at once. The pass propagates compact bit-parallel per-mutation state and uses an adaptive sparse/dense carrier set representation spanning rare-to-common variant densities. Batching is the memory-scalable complement to split-based parallelism, which instead replicates graph and traversal state per worker. Our remapping is evaluated on a controlled update workload and on end-to-end allele polarization, a bulk carrier set update that is common in population genetic analysis. Our approach is up to 10.5$\times$ faster than independent remapping while preserving exact carrier-set semantics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Aaron Li, Yifan Li, Drew DeHaas, Giulia Guidi. 2026-08-27. Cheaper by the Batch: Shared Traversal for Genotype Graph Editing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26488

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS