Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.26763

Categorizer Automata for Discounted-Sum Payoffs

Nathalie Bertrand·Pranav Ghorpade·Senthil Rajasekaran·Sasha Rubin·Moshe Vardi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Categorizing continuous data into discrete bins is a fundamental operation in artificial intelligence. We introduce the categorizer automaton, a deterministic automaton that reads an infinite sequence of rewards and identifies which of finitely many bins contains its discounted sum. Categorizer automata generalize comparator automata, the special case of two bins, which have already proven useful in quantitative synthesis. Our main technical contribution is the construction of a categorizer automaton whose state space is linear in the number of bins, rather than exponential as obtained by a cross-product of comparator automata. We then apply categorizer automata to Markov decision processes, where they allow one to synthesize policies that maximize the expected utility of a discounted-sum payoff for utility functions that may be discontinuous. For piecewise-constant utility functions, the resulting algorithm is exact and runs in pseudo-polynomial time. For piecewise-Lipschitz utility functions, a class that includes any utility with bounded slope between finitely many jumps, it again runs in pseudo-polynomial time and yields an $\varepsilon$-optimal policy. We also show that the synthesis problem considered is PSPACE-hard already for piecewise-constant utilities.

Explore related subjects

cs.AIcs.FL

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nathalie Bertrand, Pranav Ghorpade, Senthil Rajasekaran, Sasha Rubin, Moshe Vardi. 2026-08-27. Categorizer Automata for Discounted-Sum Payoffs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26763

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗