SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.26952

On the Instance Optimality of Bidirectional Dijkstra's Algorithm

Abstract

Recent work by Haeupler, Hlad\'ik, Rozhon, Tarjan, and T\v{e}tek on the instance optimality of shortest-path algorithms established several results concerning Dijkstra's algorithm and bidirectional Dijkstra's algorithm in weighted and unweighted graphs. Motivated by these results, we revisit the question of instance optimality for shortest $st$-path algorithms in the standard query model. We identify several issues in the analysis of the instance optimality of both unidirectional and bidirectional Dijkstra's algorithms and provide corresponding counterexamples. We then propose a minimal simple modification of the bidirectional Dijkstra algorithm and prove that the resulting variant is instance optimal in the weighted setting. Furthermore, we revisit the unweighted case, provide a simplified proof of the lower bound showing that no algorithm can achieve instance optimality up to a factor better than $O(\Delta)$, where $\Delta$ denotes the maximum degree of the graph, and discuss the implications of this result for approximation algorithms. Finally, we make progress on the open problem of instance optimality in simple graphs. We show that if the problem instance satisfies $n\ge m/16$, where $n$ is the number of nodes and $m$ is the number of edges queried by our algorithm, then it is optimal up to a constant factor. Additionally, we show instance optimality for a broad class of instances, in particular when the largest degree in the graph is at most the square root of the number of explored edges, our algorithm exhibits optimality up to a constant factor.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Matic Požar. 2026-08-27. On the Instance Optimality of Bidirectional Dijkstra's Algorithm. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26952

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS