Training-free Suction Grasp Detection for Deformed Aseptic Cartons Using Vision-Language Models and Geometric Surface Scoring

Marin Maletic; Goran Vasiljevic

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.28246

Training-free Suction Grasp Detection for Deformed Aseptic Cartons Using Vision-Language Models and Geometric Surface Scoring

Marin Maletic·Goran Vasiljevic

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Robotic sorting of recyclable waste is challenging due to the deformable and geometrically inconsistent nature of target objects. We present a training-free suction grasping system for sorting deformed aseptic beverage cartons, decoupling target identification from grasp-point selection. An open-vocabulary vision-language model detects cartons from a text prompt, SAM2 refines each detection into an instance mask, and a geometric scoring method selects the suction point by combining surface flatness with normal alignment. Three geometric methods are compared: k-nearest-neighbour PCA, Sobel cross-product, and RANSAC plane fitting. Evaluated on a real robot across three deformation levels and 35 cluttered scenes, single-object grasp success reaches 88.2% and end-to-end retrieval in clutter is 72.6%.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO cs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Marin Maletic, Goran Vasiljevic. 2026-08-28. Training-free Suction Grasp Detection for Deformed Aseptic Cartons Using Vision-Language Models and Geometric Surface Scoring. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28246

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subject cs.RO subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related discoveries

arXiv2026

When Robots Mishear Us: Mapping the Safety Risks of Voice-Controlled Embodied AI

We investigate whether automatic speech recognition (ASR) errors in user input can lead to unsafe outputs from Embodied AI (EAI) models. We find that ASR errors can lead to harmful instructions being accepted and executed by EAI models, thereby reducing safety. We simulate ASR errors and combine them with existing safety benchmarks (SafeAgentBench and POEX) to evaluate how different errors affect embodied AI safety. We find that some of them preserve semantic structure but increase harmful ambiguity, while others weaken the model refusal behaviour and allow unsafe plans to be generated and executed. We show that in some cases automatic correction of ASR errors can reduce the risk, but this is not always effective. Overall, we show that ASR errors lead to significant safety risks for embodied AI.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Fully Distributed GNE Algorithms for Multi-Robot Placement without Consensus on Multipliers

Recent machine learning research has increasingly focused on equilibrium analysis in non-cooperative games rather than solely on optimal solutions. Many such problems involve shared constraints and can be formulated as Generalized Nash Equilibrium Problems (GNEPs). For strongly monotone games, existing methods compute consensus-based variational GNEs (v-GNEs) by exchanging Lagrange multipliers. We propose a fully distributed continuous-time algorithm for shared linear equality constraints that converges without multiplier exchange and reaches any GNE, reducing communication overhead and improving privacy. Discrete-time schemes are also provided, and the method is validated on a multi-robot placement task.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

A Statistical Audit of Physical AI Benchmark Redundancy

Physical AI models are evaluated on suites of benchmarks that differ across model reports, leaving the model-by-benchmark matrix sparse and the relationship between benchmarks unmeasured. We construct a matrix of 51 models on 12 physical AI benchmarks, selected from a registry of 51 benchmarks and 152 models by reporting density, combining scores from model cards and benchmark papers with our own evaluation runs under each benchmark's official protocol. We measure how much information the benchmarks share and show quantitative evidence of Redundancy. Redundancy affects reported rankings: collapsing the two substitute pairs into single columns moves 22 of 51 models by three or more places under an equally weighted average. We then select benchmarks greedily under a utility combining score dispersion with variance not explained by the already-selected set, and obtain a four-benchmark subset retaining 78.5\% of the utility of all 12, on which we fit a Bradley--Terry ranking. The procedure requires only benchmark-level scores with sufficient overlap and is not specific to physical AI.

cs.RO↗