Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.29418

Scheduling to Maximize Weighted Throughput with an Active-Time Budget

Susanne Albers·G. Wessel van der Heijden
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the active-time scheduling problem with weighted throughput maximization. In this setting, a set of $n$ jobs $J$ arrive at integer release times, each with an integer processing time and integer deadline. Jobs may be preempted at integer time slot boundaries. A schedule assigns jobs to time slots, with at most $m$ jobs assigned to the same time slot. A slot is called \emph{active} if at least one job is scheduled in it. Instead of scheduling all jobs to minimize the number of active time slots, we consider the more general variant of \emph{weighted throughput} with an active-time budget $K$, where each job $j\in J$ has a weight $w_j$. The objective is to maximize the total weight of \emph{completed} jobs using at most $K$ active time slots. This means that partially scheduled jobs do not count towards the objective. The classical active-time minimization problem is recovered by asking whether all jobs can be completed within a given active-time budget. We give hardness, approximation, and exact algorithmic results. For general intervals with unbounded parallelism, we prove NP-hardness, rule out an FPTAS unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$, and give a pseudo-polynomial time $\Omega(1/\log K)$-approximation. For proper intervals, we prove a canonical structural lemma and obtain an exact $(nK)^{O(m)}$-time algorithm. For laminar intervals, we give an exact $f(K,m)\cdot n^{O(1)}$-time algorithm.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Susanne Albers, G. Wessel van der Heijden. 2026-08-29. Scheduling to Maximize Weighted Throughput with an Active-Time Budget. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29418

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.DS subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗