Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2608.30311

One AI Signal, Many Human Judgments: A Bayesian Cascade Analysis of AI-based Credibility Indicators in Online Information Spread

Zhuoran Lu·Weilong Wang·Yangyang Yu·Xinru Wang·Zhuoyan Li·Zhiwei Liu·Sophia Ananiadou
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Social media platforms increasingly use AI-based credibility indicators to help users judge misinformation. Unlike individual human-AI decision-making, these indicators are embedded in information spread: users see both an AI prediction and earlier judgments shaped by the same AI, and their own judgments may then enter the public history. Yet how to analytically characterize this process remains under-explored. We therefore introduce a social-learning lens for this setting by extending the classical Bayesian cascade model with the AI indicator as a shared public signal. The resulting Gateway condition compares the evidence from the AI prediction with users' private impressions. Through this view, we show that AI changes what public history means. Crowd agreement may reflect accumulated independent human evidence, or repeated dependence on the same AI prediction. This creates a preservation-correction trade-off: stronger reliance on AI can preserve correct predictions, but can also lock in incorrect ones by blocking corrective private impressions. We calibrate the model using human-subject data on news veracity judgments. Although the AI outperforms human users, the average user weights it below her own impression but above several peer judgments, while individual users vary from discounting the AI to relying on it enough to cascade. Simulations show that over-reliance on a weak AI is especially harmful, and that diversifying AI signals across users can better keep the crowd informative. We conclude with implications for understanding human-AI interaction in information spread and designing misinformation interventions.

Explore related subjects

cs.HCcs.AIcs.SI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zhuoran Lu, Weilong Wang, Yangyang Yu, Xinru Wang, Zhuoyan Li, Zhiwei Liu, Sophia Ananiadou. 2026-08-31. One AI Signal, Many Human Judgments: A Bayesian Cascade Analysis of AI-based Credibility Indicators in Online Information Spread. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30311

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subjectcs.HC subjectcs.SI subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related discoveries

arXiv2026

Beyond Truth Discovery: A Two-Stage Framework to Assess the Severity of False Claim during Disasters

False information spreads rapidly on social media during disasters and can undermine emergency response efforts, public trust, and crisis communication. Existing research primarily focuses on determining whether social media posts contain false information, but provides limited insight into the specific false claims embedded within posts and the severity of individual false claims. To address the limitations, we propose a two-stage framework to assess the severity of false claims during disasters. In the first stage, we develop a false claim extraction agent that identifies false claims from multimodal social media posts containing text, images, videos, and links. A subsequent verification step validates extracted claims with supporting evidence. In the second stage, we define false claim severity as the combination of two complementary dimensions: believability, which determines the likelihood that a claim will be believed, and harmfulness, which captures the potential consequences if it is believed. Human annotators assess both dimensions to construct a claim-level severity benchmark using false claims extracted from Reddit posts related to hurricanes and wildfires. Building upon this benchmark, we investigate false claim severity assessment as a human-AI alignment problem, evaluating whether models can reproduce human judgments under a shared evaluation rubric rather than merely predicting severity labels. Experiments on the benchmark show that traditional supervised models exhibit limited alignment with human judgments, whereas Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve substantially stronger performance. Among the evaluated strategies, in-context learning consistently achieves the strongest alignment with human judgments, highlighting the importance of human examples and shared decision criteria for severity assessment.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Filling holes in science draws collective attention, but most higher-order holes remain unexplored

Much scientific discovery involves filling holes between ideas and arguments that unleash techno-scientific advance. Representing knowledge as high-dimensional concept embeddings, we use persistent homology to detect holes of increasing order, from gaps between disconnected ideas to higher-order cavities, and identify the research works that fill them. We find two empirical asymmetries. Researchers who fill anticipated holes are poised to draw collective attention by staging outsized novelty and foresight, indicating that bridging holes anticipates where science will converge, most strongly in empirical fields and least in formal and design fields. Yet as knowledge grows, higher-order holes explode while the fraction science fills collapses, leaving most higher-order combinations unexplored. These results call for a richer science of holes, and mark a frontier where contemporary AI might help fill the high-dimensional gaps human science opens.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Algorithmic Simplification for Million-Vertex Diffusion History Reconstruction

Diffusion history reconstruction infers latent node states between sparse observations of SI or SIR processes. HERMES combines parameter fitting, a learned graph-neural proposal, and feasibility-aware Markov chain Monte Carlo. We remove these stages one at a time and evaluate each version on all 12 canonical datasets. The final method uses deterministic mean-field forward-backward inference, threshold decoding, and fixed rates. This fixed-rate variant, Battus-Z, achieves mean macro-F1 of 0.8726 and NRMSE of 0.1010, compared with published HERMES aggregates of 0.8692 and 0.1483. The benchmark pins the final observed frame before scoring, so we also exclude all observed frames. Under this metric, Battus-Z obtains macro-F1 0.8431 and NRMSE 0.1181. Thus, the learned proposal, MCMC, and fitting stages can be removed while retaining the published aggregate quality on the evaluated HERMES benchmark and scoring protocol. A CUDA implementation processes generated histories with up to 4.84M vertices on LiveJournal and 117M edges on Orkut. On the same CUDA backend, Battus-Z reduces the geometric-mean algorithm interval relative to fitted Battus by 5.1x for SI and 20.3x for SIR. Its event-weighted causal-violation rates are 7.50% for SI and 8.77% for SIR; graph-constrained decoding remains future work.

cs.SI↗