SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2608.31061

Structural Corrections to the Bethe Approximation of the Permanent

Abstract

We study deterministic approximation algorithms for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix through the Bethe permanent, an approximation computable in polynomial time. The tight analysis of Anari and Rezaei gives a universal comparison between the permanent and the Bethe permanent within a factor $(\sqrt 2)^n$. The simple example of the unweighted $4$-cycle $C_4$ (or a union of disjoint $C_4$'s) shows that this bound is tight. We show that such $4$-cycle obstructions can be identified and exploited algorithmically. Given a Bethe optimizer, our algorithm identifies nearly isolated weighted $2\times2$ blocks and peels off a vertex-disjoint family of them. If the total weighted correction is large, we can improve the Bethe approximation; if it is small, we show that the Bethe permanent is within a factor of $(\sqrt2 - \varepsilon)^n$ of the truth. Combining these facts, we obtain a deterministic polynomial time $(\sqrt2-\varepsilon)^n$-approximation algorithm for the permanent of an arbitrary nonnegative $n\times n$ matrix, where $\varepsilon>0$ is some absolute constant.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ijay Narang, Will Perkins. 2026-08-31. Structural Corrections to the Bethe Approximation of the Permanent. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31061

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS