SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2609.00831

FLaG: Frequency-Domain Latent-attention Gated Pooling for Token Aggregation

Abstract

Token aggregation converts token-level representations into fixed-dimensional sample representations, but most pooling methods operate only in the original token space. We introduce Frequency-Domain Latent-attention Gated Pooling (FLaG), a plug-in aggregation module that re-expresses encoder outputs in the Fourier domain before final pooling. FLaG represents the nonredundant rFFT spectrum through concatenated real and imaginary components, summarizes spectral tokens with learnable latent queries, derives a sample-conditioned channel gate, and reconstructs modulated token representations for downstream aggregation. We evaluate the same architecture across ESM2-based antimicrobial peptide (AMP) activity prediction, ResNet18 image classification on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, and three RoBERTa-based language tasks. FLaG achieves the best macro-averaged Spearman correlation coefficient, RMSE, and Recall@50 across four AMP backbone-species settings and the highest top-1 accuracy on CIFAR 10. It also achieves the best mean results on five of seven language metrics, although mean pooling remains strongest on STSBenchmark. AMP-side mechanistic analyses reveal low-frequency prediction sensitivity across most encoder layers, with increased relative high-frequency sensitivity in the final layer, and pronounced peptide-specific positional responses. The residual gate broadly amplifies spectral channels while preserving the low-frequency-dominated energy profile, whereas latent cross-attention exhibits sample- and species-specific spectral allocation. Overall, FLaG provides a transferable frequency-domain aggregation bias across protein, visual, and textual representations, with benefits that depend on the backbone and downstream task. Supplementary materials, source code, and data are available at https://www.healthinformaticslab.org/supp/ and https://github.com/Kewei2023/AMPCliff/tree/FLaG.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kewei Li, Rongying Zhang, Xueli Wang, Xiwen Gong, Zhongjian Wang, Qiuchen Zhao, Lan Huang, Ruochi Zhang, Fengfeng Zhou. 2026-09-01. FLaG: Frequency-Domain Latent-attention Gated Pooling for Token Aggregation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00831

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI