Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.01283

Sensitivity Oracles for Matroid Packing, Matroid Covering, and Matching Problems with Applications

Keerti Choudhary·Amit Kumar·Lakshay Saggi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Sensitivity oracles preprocess a graph so that queries can be answered after any $f$ edge insertions and deletions, without recomputing from scratch. For structural optimization problems the known landscape is limited: for flows and cuts, all known compact oracles handle only $f\le2$ failures; existing oracles for $s$- and global min-cut apply only to undirected graphs; and for matchings, arborescence and spanning-tree packings, and arboricity, no efficient oracle is known for $f>1$. We present a unified algebraic framework based on sensitivity oracles for matroid packing, covering, and parity of sparse linear matroids, yielding the first oracles supporting an arbitrary number $f$ of updates across all of these problems (all constructions randomized Monte-Carlo). Concretely, we obtain efficient oracles for exact $(s,t)$-max-flow/min-cut, resolving an open problem of Baswana, Bhanja, and Pandey (ICALP'22) with near-optimal space; for all-pairs $k$-bounded flow, generalizing the near-optimal reachability oracle of Brand and Saranurak (FOCS'19, the case $k=1$); the first oracles for any $f$ for directed $s$- and global min-cut; oracles for $k$-disjoint arborescences, $k$-disjoint spanning trees, colorful spanning trees, and arboricity; and oracles for the existence of an $\alpha$-factor, with perfect matching as the case $\alpha=1$. We further introduce the \emph{subset sensitivity model}, in which updates are confined to a susceptible edge set of size $\sigma$ fixed during preprocessing. Here we decouple updates from the matroid representation and eliminate the dependence on $k$ and the matroid density altogether: all of the above are supported with $\widetilde O(f^\omega)$ query time and $O(f\sigma^2)$ space. We also prove a matching $\Omega(\min\{\sigma^2,n^2\})$-bit lower bound when $f\ge2$, establishing optimality.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Keerti Choudhary, Amit Kumar, Lakshay Saggi. 2026-09-01. Sensitivity Oracles for Matroid Packing, Matroid Covering, and Matching Problems with Applications. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01283

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.DS subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗