Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.06331

Geometric Distributional Control: Learning Progress with Partial Structural Knowledge

Tong Wu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Real-time control often sits between two limiting regimes. Predictive optimization and model-based control are powerful when dynamics, parameters, objectives, and online planning models are specified; reinforcement learning can relax this requirement, but must infer long-horizon value signals from sequential data and interaction, making training slow, high-variance, and hard to scale in large action spaces. This middle regime is common in systems including autonomous driving, warehouse robotics, traffic control, and delivery drones: partial geometry, physics, rules, or constraints are known, yet the local direction of task progress remains uncertain. Geometric Distributional Control (GDC) is designed for this partial-knowledge setting. It factorizes control into feasibility and progress: known geometry, rules, constraints, and response maps define an executable scaffold, while progress-weighted feasible data learns the missing directional signal on that scaffold. The learned score acts as a Bellman-like local value-gradient, selecting actions that make progress without requiring global Bellman recursion, a fully specified planner, or a black-box policy that absorbs both feasibility and preference. This knowledge can be lightweight and partial, such as simple dynamics, safety filters, local maps, constraint projectors, or lower-level response maps; it need not encode full dynamics or a long-horizon objective. Offline, GDC fits a progress-tilted distribution from short known-feasible snippets with weak signed progress certificates. Online, its score is projected through the scaffold and applied in receding-horizon feedback. We prove that this score descends a data-induced soft progress value and validate GDC on structured multilevel optimization and SUMO route-progress driving, where it improves over known-only solvers and learning baselines while preserving scaffold-enforced feasibility.

Explore related subjects

cs.ROcs.SYeess.SY

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tong Wu. 2026-09-06. Geometric Distributional Control: Learning Progress with Partial Structural Knowledge. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06331

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.RO subjectcs.SY subjecteess.SY subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗