arXiv · 2609.07915
JEDI: JEPA-to-Edge Distillation for Efficient Cropland Segmentation from Satellite Imagery
Abstract
Large vision models provide useful representations for remote-sensing segmentation but are often too expensive for deployment at the satellite or field edge. Existing feature-level distillation methods also tend to assume similar teacher and student architectures and often stop feature alignment when task training begins. We introduce JEDI (JEPA-to-Edge Distillation), a two-stage framework that transfers representations from a large I-JEPA Vision Transformer teacher to a compact SegFormer student. First, JEDI aligns the student's terminal representation with the teacher's token space using cross-architecture projection and spatial alignment. It then jointly optimizes supervised segmentation, temperature-scaled response distillation, and persistent feature alignment throughout task adaptation. On CalCROP21, JEDI-B0 achieves 68.0 mean Intersection-over-Union (mIoU) with 4.04M parameters, improving over the standalone student by 16.0 points and coming within 2.0 points of the 70.0 mIoU achieved by the 639M-parameter teacher. We evaluate SegFormer B0, B1, and B2 students with 4.04M, 14.33M, and 28M parameters, respectively. Across all three variants, JEDI consistently outperforms response-, structure-, channel-, and relational-distillation baselines under the same teacher-student setting. These results show that persistent representation alignment is especially valuable under aggressive compression, substantially reducing model size and computation while preserving segmentation performance.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Kishor Kumar Bhaumik, Nicolas Roque dos Santos, Jia Chen, Evangelos E. Papalexakis. 2026-09-07. JEDI: JEPA-to-Edge Distillation for Efficient Cropland Segmentation from Satellite Imagery. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07915
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
Discover connections
Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.