Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.12406

Representation Multiplicity in Causal Forests

Abstract

Including covariates alongside strictly monotone transformations can change a causal forest's treatment decisions without adding information. Random feature selection favors covariates represented by these multiple columns. Under stated conditions, I show that this imbalance can persist as samples grow. Treatment effect components associated with other covariates are omitted, attenuated, or recovered depending on their inclusion probabilities and tree depth. Simulations and a job-training replication illustrate sensitivity to redundant transformations. Sampling groups of variables that generate identical splits restores prediction invariance on the grouping data when fitting and randomization are held fixed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yi Niu. 2026-10-10. Representation Multiplicity in Causal Forests. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12406

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Balanced Parametrization of Correlation Matrices

We introduce the balanced correlation parametrization (BCP), which maps positive-definite correlation matrices one-to-one onto the set of symmetric hollow matrices. A key feature of the parametrization is that both the transformation and its inverse are available in closed form. It combines marginal and partial correlations, is inverse-consistent and equivariant under variable permutations and sign changes, and preserves block structure. A novel property of BCP is that it preserves correlation sparsity as the dimension tends to infinity under suitable factor conditions, providing a basis for sparse high-dimensional correlation modeling. An empirical illustration using standardized idiosyncratic daily stock returns for 1,765 equities over 15 years shows that BCP retains the approximate sparsity pattern and magnitudes of shock correlations, and that it yields accurate positive-definite reconstructions under sparse coordinate restrictions.

econ.EM↗

Is Inference Conditional on Not Rejecting a Pre-test Less Reliable than Unconditional Inference?

Researchers often report an estimate and confidence interval only if a specification test does not reject - for example, only if a pre-trend test supports a difference-in-differences design. Does this make the reported confidence interval less reliable? We show that when the identifying assumptions hold, the answer is no: conditional on passing the pre-test, the confidence interval may over-cover but cannot under-cover. When the assumptions fail, pre-testing can reduce coverage, but under an additional condition it still improves coverage relative to not pre-testing. A calibration to 12 differences-in-differences examples suggests modest effects of pre-testing on coverage.

econ.EM↗

Higher-Order Neyman Orthogonality in Moment-Condition Models

We construct moment functions that are Neyman-orthogonal to a chosen order in parametric moment condition models involving nuisance parameters. These moment functions reduce sensitivity to estimation error in the nuisance parameters and, as such, offer a unified and tractable route to higher-order debiasing in a wide range of econometric models. The number of additional nuisance parameters required by our construction, beyond those already present in the original moment conditions, is independent of the order of orthogonalization and can be reduced to a single scalar if desired.

econ.EM↗